首页> 外文OA文献 >Political parties or party systems?: assessing the ‘myth’ of institutionalization and democracy
【2h】

Political parties or party systems?: assessing the ‘myth’ of institutionalization and democracy

机译:政党或政党制度?:评估制度化和民主的“神话”

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

No matter the region of the world under study, party (system) institutionalisation has been traditionally considered to be a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for the survival of democracy. Despite being one of the most quoted statements in the democratisation literature, the few studies looking at the relationship between institutionalisation and democratic endurance have found no evidence of the ‘almost magical’ powers of the former. This article revisits the abovementioned research question by making use of an original dataset covering all European democracies between 1848 and 2014. The main findings are threefold: (1) it is not the institutionalisation of political parties but the institutionalisation of party systems as a whole that has fostered the prospects for democratic survival in Europe; (2) there is a threshold of systemic institutionalisation which, once reached, will avoid democratic collapse; and (3) systemic over-institutionalisation does not seem to be so perilous for the survival of democracy.
机译:无论研究的世界哪个地区,政党(系统)制度化在传统上都被认为是民主生存的必要条件,但不是充分条件。尽管这是民主化文献中被引用最多的声明之一,但很少有研究探讨制度化与民主耐力之间的关系的研究,没有发现前者具有“几乎神奇”的力量的证据。本文通过利用涵盖1848年至2014年间所有欧洲民主国家的原始数据集来重新审视上述研究问题。主要发现有三点:(1)不是政党制度化,而是整个政党制度的制度化促进了欧洲民主生存的前景; (2)有一个系统的制度化门槛,一旦达到该门槛,就可以避免民主崩溃; (3)制度化的过度制度化似乎对民主的生存没有那么危险。

著录项

  • 作者

    Casal Bértoa, Fernando;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号